// you’re reading...

Pickup

Keychain Debunks: Going in Direct vs Going Indirect

Hey guys,

Okay, let’s clear something up here – it’s one of my pet hates with the way us community folks talk about direct and indirect opening.

Read the following sentences ALOUD:

- ‘LMR is one of the problems with going indirect.’

- ‘I recommend guys go in direct these days, it conveys more sexual intent.’

And the sentence that sums it all up:

- Going in direct is the way more efficient than going indirect.’

Have you spotted the cause of my upset yet?

Saying: ‘going in direct’ sounds EXACTLY THE SAME as saying ‘going indirect‘…although they mean totally different things! This is very confusing!

Many times I’ve been at a seminar or conference and watched a collective look of exasperated befuddlement sweep across a room of students when the speaker utters something like the above lines. Let’s clean up these phrases because it’s confusing to beginners and, far more importantly, very annoying!

A Look of Exasperated Confusion

ABOVE: A Look of Exasperated Befuddlement

Proposed solutions:

Solution 1: ‘going indirect’ + ‘going direct’

Solution2: ‘going in indirect’ + ‘going in direct’

Solution3: ‘opening indirectly’ + ‘opening directly’

So what do you guys think? Personally, I use Solution3 when I teach. Does anyone have some other good suggestions?

Let’s sally forth and rid the land of this rankling turn of phrase, huzzah!!!!

Keys

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Discussion

No comments for “Keychain Debunks: Going in Direct vs Going Indirect”

Post a comment

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.7.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.