Hey guys,
Okay, let’s clear something up here – it’s one of my pet hates with the way us community folks talk about direct and indirect opening.
Read the following sentences ALOUD:
- ‘LMR is one of the problems with going indirect.’
- ‘I recommend guys go in direct these days, it conveys more sexual intent.’
And the sentence that sums it all up:
- Going in direct is the way more efficient than going indirect.’
Have you spotted the cause of my upset yet?
Saying: ‘going in direct’ sounds EXACTLY THE SAME as saying ‘going indirect‘…although they mean totally different things! This is very confusing!
Many times I’ve been at a seminar or conference and watched a collective look of exasperated befuddlement sweep across a room of students when the speaker utters something like the above lines. Let’s clean up these phrases because it’s confusing to beginners and, far more importantly, very annoying!

ABOVE: A Look of Exasperated Befuddlement
Proposed solutions:
Solution 1: ‘going indirect’ + ‘going direct’
Solution2: ‘going in indirect’ + ‘going in direct’
Solution3: ‘opening indirectly’ + ‘opening directly’
So what do you guys think? Personally, I use Solution3 when I teach. Does anyone have some other good suggestions?
Let’s sally forth and rid the land of this rankling turn of phrase, huzzah!!!!
Keys
Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.7.3, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.
Discussion
No comments for “Keychain Debunks: Going in Direct vs Going Indirect”
Post a comment